Alu­ratek ABD2020 USB 2.0 Hi Speed Blue­tooth EDR Adapter

Would you like to be treated with dig­nity?  We value self-esteem and our com­mon human­ity cries out to “save that life” when a child is in dan­ger.

In 1987, the world watched with prayers and bated breath for 2½ days as “Baby Jes­sica” was metic­u­lously res­cued after falling into an 8” pipe. She was the child of teen par­ents who have since divorced. They never even told her the story and she has no actual mem­o­ries of the inci­dent. She learned about it after watch­ing “Res­cue 911” three years later. Jes­sica has under­gone many surg­eries as a result of the ordeal, but there is a scar which she has cho­sen to keep because she says, “It shows who I am, and the fact that I am here and that I could have not been here,” she told Matt Lauer dur­ing an inter­view. She says, “I sur­vived it.” In fact, when she was res­cued, the world cheered and church bells rang out. We rejoiced that one life was saved.

If I were shar­ing this post as a speech, I would ask the fol­low­ing:

“So, let’s play a lit­tle game that I call “Oppo­sites and Oxy­morons.” I’ll say a word and each of you shout out the antonym.” It would go some­thing like this:

High/Low
Good/Bad
Light/Darkness
Short/Long
Free/Slave
Correct/Incorrect
True/False
Right/Wrong
Life/Death

How­ever, I would have to stop and say that in Amer­ica, the oppo­site of Life is Choice, because for the unborn, Choice is equal to Death.

“Polit­i­cally Cor­rect” is an oxy­moron. Every­body believes that politi­cians are pro­fes­sional at speak­ing out of both sides of their mouths. How can con­tra­dic­tory state­ments both be cor­rect?

As Amer­i­cans, we value life. Yet, appar­ently, we value free­dom of choice more. So, it was a stroke of genius when the abor­tion indus­try decided not to admit that they were pro-death (although their state­ments and arti­cles prove this out). Instead, they said that they are pro-choice. And pro-Life Amer­i­cans who were (and still are) in major­ity sud­denly said, “Oh, I never thought about it like that” and stuck their heads back in the sand.

Accord­ing to LifeIs­sues org., Supreme Court nom­i­nee, Sonia Sotomayor, had an inter­est­ing, yet alarm­ing con­ver­sa­tion with Sen­a­tor Jim DeMint. She’s been mak­ing the rounds with sen­a­tors, try­ing to get on their good sides because the sen­ate has to con­firm her appoint­ment. Sen­a­tor DeMint asked her if an unborn child has any rights what­so­ever. Her response shocked him. Judge Sotomayor said she had “never thought about” the rights of unborn chil­dren. The sen­a­tor says this goes beyond abor­tion and raises seri­ous ques­tions about her respect for human life at all stages. Sen­a­tor DeMint said, “Those who serve on the high­est court in Amer­ica must have an unwa­ver­ing com­mit­ment to the Con­sti­tu­tion and equal jus­tice for all Amer­i­cans.” He believes this should include unborn babies.

What do you think? What will you do about it?